Cloud migration in Cyprus — planned, not gambled

It depends on the workload and your timeline. Lift-and-shift is fastest and lowest-risk but carries old inefficiencies; re-architecting unlocks cloud-native savings but costs more upfront. We assess per application rather than applying one strategy to everything.

Yes — it is one of our most common migrations right now. We move VMs off Broadcom-era VMware to Proxmox (or to cloud), handle storage, networking and the things that do not transfer cleanly, and cut over in slices with a rollback. We have written about what actually moves and what breaks.

Yes — a lot of our migration work is exits: off Broadcom-era VMware to Proxmox or cloud, or repatriating from a cloud that got expensive. We have written about what actually moves and what breaks.

Staged cutover with a rollback at each step, data validated before the switch, and a tested restore. We migrate in slices so a problem affects one workload, not the whole business.

Only if it is modelled honestly. We build a cost model before committing — including egress and managed-service pricing — so the decision is based on numbers, not a vendor slide. Sometimes the answer is to stay or repatriate.

Migration is scoped per project; ongoing operation runs from €500/month. See pricing.

The right ones for the target, not a single favourite. For cloud moves that often means Azure Migrate for assessment and server migration into Azure, AWS DMS (Database Migration Service) for databases, Terraform and Ansible to build the target as code, and replication or restic/rsync for data — each chosen per workload and validated with a tested restore before cutover.